Acer Helios 300 SpatialLabs Version review: Glasses-free 3D is sweet pointless

All products urged by Engadget are chosen by our editorial team, self sustaining of our parent firm. Some of our tales encompass affiliate hyperlinks. When you clutch one thing by one among these hyperlinks, we would also gain an affiliate commission. All costs are exact on the time of publishing.

There is an infinite gulf between the dreamy conception of glasses-free 3D – further visual depth with none clunky glance-attach on! – and the truth: fuzzy imagery, buggy execution, and complications. Oh, the complications. So it goes with Acer’s Predator Helios 300 SpatialLabs Version, equipped with the firm’s glasses-free 3D screen. It be meant to release an fully contemporary dimension of gameplay in titles take care of God of War and Forza Horizon 5 – and it does, to a diploma. But it in actual fact’s additionally obscenely costly, starting up at $3,499, and its 3D functionality just just isn’t price shedding the increased refresh charges and better quality screens you salvage on most varied gaming laptops.

After I’ve demoed glasses-free 3D in the past, or not it’s in any admire times regarded take care of a doubtlessly vital characteristic for deep-pocketed professionals, of us that will must verify out their 3D models without slapping on a VR headset. That would very successfully be impartial appropriate, however the Helios 300 SpatialLabs Version convinced me that it serves nearly no reason in the gaming world, the place gamers are step by step aiming to inject as many frames of their eyeballs as that you just might judge.

Acer

Acer Predator Helios 300 SpatialLabs Version

Pros

• Provocative glasses-free 3D screen works successfully for some games
• Powerful hardware
• Masses of ports

Cons

• Too costly when put next to 2D gaming laptops
• Low refresh payment ofr gaming
• Little library of 3D games
• No pink meat up for online shooters
• Moderate keyboard and trackpad

That’s impartial appropriate not that you just might judge with this pc, since or not it’s restricted to a 15.6-go 4K panel (which scales down to 1080p per glance in 3D mode) running at 60Hz. So at handiest, this gaming pc is particular to 60fps at a time when even funds machines can carry ample energy to bear 120Hz and 144Hz screens. The tradeoff for glasses-free 3D, in the waste, is responsiveness while gaming. The increased the refresh payment, the more silky soft a game can seem. And in the case of rapid-paced shooters, it will make the total difference between a dangle headshot and digital oblivion.

Now if Acer’s 3D technology used to be in actual fact groundbreaking, presumably that wouldn’t subject so noteworthy. But while it will glimpse appropriate, or not it’s a mere curiosity. Acer’s TrueGame app enables you to play a make a choice handful of games in two varied modes: 3D+, which shifts depth buffer pixels to carry a imprecise depth beget, and 3D Ultra, which makes expend of a virtual second camera to diagram a diagram more immersive sense of place. Ticket tracking sensors above the screen reduction to direct two varied models of photography to your eyes, a plot that’s customary for glasses-free 3D shows, however that additionally formulation handiest one particular person can in actual fact expend the 3D characteristic. As for game pink meat up, there are handiest 9 games the utilization of 3D Ultra in the mean time, at the side of God of War, Psychonauts 2 and A Plague Tale: Innocence. Acer says around Sixty 5 titles, principally older games, work with 3D+.

Competitive online shooters don’t seem like supported in any admire – Acer claims their anti-cheat system prevents its 3D technology from being applied. That’s a disgrace if you happen to had been hoping moderately of depth would make your Warzone or Apex Legends fits more rewarding. If truth be told, you might not must play those in 3D either, as the technology in most cases makes games glimpse much less intelligent. That you just might even blame the marginally decrease resolution for that, as successfully as the inherent haziness from having your eyes alter to a 3D screen on the cruise.

Taking half in Forza Horizon 5 in 3D+ used to be nearly take care of having a glimpse at a Magic Ticket puzzle – I had to be in only appropriate the shining place to detect any depth. And if my eyes shifted moderately, I would now and again lose the beget fully. God of War fared better in 3D Ultra Mode, with a convincing sense of immersion equivalent to what you might quiz from a 3D film. Throwing Kratos’s axe had the uncanny beget of going past the screen in my place of enterprise, and at events the Helios 300 SL felt take care of a portal into one other world.

Aloof, taking half in God of War in 3D nearly straight away made my eyes tired. 3D Ultra relies on your brain constantly making sense of two varied camera views. I now and again felt motion sick while I was walking at some stage in the game, particularly if I glanced over to my unmoving, litter-stuffed desk. It used to be nearly take care of taking half in the game in VR, sans the chunky headset. I learned myself resting my eyes every half-hour or so, impartial appropriate take care of I gain with VR headsets.

You are going to, in spite of every little thing, play any PC title in 2D on the Helios 300 SL, however why would you clutch a $3,500 glass-free 3D pc for that? Our review unit used to be equipped with an RTX 3080 and Intel Core i9-12900H CPU (an up to this point model with a forty-series GPU is coming in a few months). It used to be in actual fact elephantine ample for any game I threw at it, particularly for the reason that allege is particular to 60Hz. But taking half in Halo Limitless or Overwatch 2 impartial appropriate didn’t in actual fact feel near to as soft as it did on the Acer Predator Triton 500 SE I reviewed final 365 days. That $2,300 machine featured an stunning 240Hz 1,440p screen, which helped me line up sniper photographs with ease.